ChinaModelAPI

Guides / Chinese Vision Models 2026

Comparison · updated 2026-08-21 · DeepSeek figures official; Kimi/Qwen tracker-listed

Chinese Vision Model APIs in 2026: DeepSeek Vision-Exp vs Qwen-VL vs Kimi

Every Chinese frontier lab now ships a vision-capable API. DeepSeek's deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp (Aug 21, 2026) is the newest and cheapest strong entry; Alibaba's Qwen-VL family is the broadest; Moonshot's Kimi line has carried native vision the longest. This page compares what matters for routing decisions — capability, pricing, context, open weights — with sources labeled per row.

Direct answer

Route by constraint: cheapest strong vision → deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp ($0.22/1M input off-peak, ≤384 tokens per image, multimodal agent near Opus-4.8); open-weights frontier vision + 1M context → Kimi K3; widest tier ladder from self-hostable smalls to proprietary Max → Qwen3-VL family. All three speak the OpenAI-compatible format, so one gateway can serve all of them with per-model fallbacks.

The 2026 comparison table

ModelVisionContextInput $/1MOpen weightsNotes
deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp
DeepSeek · Aug 21, 2026 · official
✓ experimental 1M $0.22 / $0.44
≤384 t/image
✗ (API-only) Text parity with V4-Flash; multimodal agent ≈ Opus-4.8; new Files API
Kimi K3
Moonshot · Jul 2026
✓ native (MoonViT) 1M K3 TBA
K2.5 ref: $0.45 (tracker)
✓ announced 2.8T-class flagship; vision since K2.5 (Jan 2026, 400M MoonViT encoder)
Qwen3-VL family
Alibaba · 2025–2026
✓ native to 1M
(3.6 Plus)
from ~$0.13
(VL 30B, tracker)
✓ small/mid tiers Widest ladder: open smalls → Qwen3.6 Plus ($0.325, tracker) → proprietary VL-Max; via DashScope
GLM-5.2 / 5.3
Zhipu · 2026
✗ text-only 1M $1.40 Included for completeness — China's top open coding flagships have not shipped vision yet

DeepSeek row from official docs (Aug 21, 2026). Kimi/Qwen figures from public model trackers (Roboflow model pages, AIViewer; updated Aug 14–20, 2026) and our Kimi API guide — verify per tier in each vendor's console before budgeting.

Three families, three philosophies

  • DeepSeek: vision as a price weapon. Vision-Exp is not a separate premium product — it's the same V4-Flash at the same token price with a 384-token image cap. The play is making vision cheap enough to put inside every agent loop. Trade-off: it's experimental, API-only, Flash-family only (no V4-Pro vision yet).
  • Moonshot: vision as a native flagship feature. Kimi has shipped native vision through its MoonViT encoder since K2.5 (January 2026) — the encoder the community literally borrowed to give V4-Flash unofficial eyes before DeepSeek caught up. K3 pairs it with a 2.8T-class model and 1M context. Trade-off: frontier pricing (K2.5 reference: $0.45/1M input).
  • Alibaba: vision as a ladder. Qwen-VL spans self-hostable open models (Qwen3-VL small tiers) through proprietary Max — pick your price-performance point. Trade-off: the breadth means the choice burden is on you, and image billing is resolution-dependent rather than capped.

Which to route: decision table

Your workloadRoute to
High-volume screenshot/UI agent loops, cost-sensitivedeepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp — ≤384t/image at Flash prices
Hard multimodal reasoning on a frontier open modelKimi K3 — native vision + 2.8T + 1M ctx
Self-hosting / air-gapped visionQwen3-VL open tiers (or community adapters for V4-Flash)
One integration, all vendors, per-model fallbackOpenAI-compatible relay covering all three (that's us — waitlist)

Against Western vision APIs

For calibration: Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists $3/1M input, Grok 4.6 $2/1M, Gemini 3.7 Flash intro $0.75/1M (our Gemini brief). Vision-Exp undercuts all three by 1.7–13.6× per token with the only hard per-image cap; the Chinese vision shelf as a whole now spans $0.13–$0.45/1M input — a bracket Western pricing doesn't touch. Full cost math in our Vision pricing guide.

FAQ

Which is cheapest for image-heavy agents?

Vision-Exp, by a wide margin: $0.22/1M input off-peak with images capped at 384 tokens. 1,000 max-size screenshots ≈ $0.08 off-peak.

Does GLM-5.2/5.3 have vision?

Not yet — Zhipu's 2026 flagships are text-only as of Aug 21, 2026. The open vision options from China are Kimi (announced weights) and Qwen-VL tiers.

Is Vision-Exp production-grade vs Kimi's native vision?

Different risk profiles: Vision-Exp is experimental (possible drift/deprecation) but cheapest; Kimi's vision has shipped in production since K2.5. Sensible pattern: Vision-Exp for cost, Kimi/Qwen-VL as the stable fallback one config flag away.

Are these numbers stable?

Chinese API pricing moves fast (DeepSeek has repriced twice since April). DeepSeek figures here are official as of Aug 21, 2026; Kimi/Qwen are tracker-listed. Re-verify before locking budgets.

Related